Heyman Lectures - Session 2, Part 3

Heyman Lectures - Session 2, Part 3
More on development - R/F, and A/U

Session 2 - Part 3

The beginning has a slight repeat from part 2. Try to evaluate introspectively, S is hardest Few females with low S in our society

Try to evaluate introspectively, S is hardest
Few females with low S in our society
Expect F to have high S and apprehensive when it does not occur.
Can find high S in psychopathic profile because individual knows - betrayed in C. High S spuriously and high C spuriously - gives right answers in C but "spoils" them. eg. Why avoid bad company? Says right answer but spoils with something like "what is bad company" or "should we really?"
Culture wants women to be F and thus high S.
For males society wants tough but sensitive so high S.
Thus examining ourselves: for example an R with high S thinks of self as F.
If take Fuc, who retains warmth and sensitivity, Fuc+ get "catastrophe theory" - if start with very low BD, very high S, individual is apprehensive about sensitivity and vulnerability to crisis and susceptibility to confusion. If reflected in very high C, get brittle personality defending against strong F. Uses procedure and organization to defend. Individual perceived as most rigid, most inflexible is overly compensated modified F.
Primitive A - an inherent innate capacity to behave in ways satisfying to their social environment.
Auu especially if low A or Fuu can walk in bar and out with any women of choice.
Auu is social chameleon and thus social manipulator.
Auc is aware of skills but anxious and knows being manipulative and predatory is not a good thing. "Acquires a conscience." "c" in Auc can "conscience" or "conventionality".
In management situation can instruct Auc to play social hardball - institutionally appropriate to play hardball. Auu only "social hardball" for his own ends.
Ac might be females who don't want the attention.
Ac can be accommodating and pleasant or hard nosed and organizationally punitive as necessary.
Ac does not lose A qualities - can use.
In some respects, Ac recommends itself to supervision and management. As A, can deal with others effectively, but as Ac does not get involved as long as not an Fuc.
The Ac can be hard-nosed. Au is charming.
This kind of detachment (Ac) is tough on U who are bewildered.
Ac can "chew out" and then go on and start over again. Tough on a U, worst for an EF. From an ER base, person had difficulty dealing with situation. EFU and ERU avoid confrontation and find covert ways to avoid.
Unlike primitive A, U has difficulty being anything other than self. "I am what I am."
With nurturing and training U can learn to be more accommodating. With high S, maybe PC comes up. Maybe reads books on how to be socially effective.
If effective in learning roles, if becomes complacent (Ucu) is very comfortable. Others may perceive as less socially adept (more limited) than they think they are.
Ucu exploits skills.
Ucc uses learned skills cautiously. People will love him more than he thinks he is being loved.
Uuc while not socially effective, has learned not to shove himself into the social traffic. Uses other two dimensions - good worker. Establish role and skill.
Uuc stays out of social traffic - seen as wallflower. If have social problems, keep them to themselves. Moody and easy embarrassed.
Uuu - reality of behavior so often does not track with what my chart and theory say. Uuu should be duds. But they are often charming - I still don't understand it. Often Ic R, but have seen Eu Fu.
Maybe Uuu - individual is not be aggressive in interpersonal environment and is so insulated that he makes no waves. Thus they don't react in negativistic way.
Other tough one is Fuu. Have seen Fuu who are organized and conventional. Maybe Fu especially if high A that behavior is in check.
Show middle of charts without primitives (basic and contact).
Think of quality of look-alike-ness. This is a great challenge to indirect assessment.
Basic Ic and Eu have characteristics in common. Likewise Iu and Ec. Also Rc and Fu. Ru and negativistic Fc in insensitivity and ability to dump on people. Uc acquires characteristics like Au. Little U kid comes along and has to figure how to get the cookie like A
Ac is reacting against this capacity for controlling, not exploiting it has characteristics often like Uu (boorish) - Ac can present as boorish on purpose. Ac does it on purpose, Uu because he doesn't know any better.
True of contacts Fuu and Rcu are similar in independence from conventionality. Fuu is naturally unbothered by rules and regulations. Rcu is unconventional, but usually in conventional ways. Both flaunt convention. Rcu has to learn the rules to flaunt them. Freedom of expression true of both.
Have talked about Fuc and Rcc similarities. Unless stretch Fuc to confusion. Rcc and Fuc look a lot alike. Fuc under stress differs. Organization, institutional, responsibility stress. Under stress R gets rote. Fuc continues as problem solver under stress. Rcc is commander who after trying to take hill 3 times and loses a third of men each time, tries again. Fuc after second time says "There must be a better way."
Detached insensitivity of Ruc and Fcc can look alike.
Look alike features are pervasive
When we are looking at profiles, even though people might look alike, our understanding of how they got there tells us a lot about how they feel about their behavior. Getting beneath behavior to feelings and value considerations.
Example: Loyal: loyal to people, institutions etc.