This session overlaps with Session 4, Part 1.
New material starts about 3:00.
New chart showing basics that tend to show up.
Then chart with professions. See the PASF Journal article.
Mike's purpose in this session is to talk about where Saunders is
going.
Reference Groups conceptually meaningful because it combines where people
"live" with PAS dynamics.
Used to have a "0" cell and make it into "A", "B", "C" outlying cells
Example: Athletes. 37 athletes.
People get into athletes for different reasons. Some become coaches.
Some are "rule keepers" (officials).
Another example: 58 in one cell, 34 in another.
Notice that none of them are in the "high brain" cells - intellectual in
approach. (Few athletes in the "no brain" categories.) But criminals
are there a lot. 10 assaultive types higher - more like pilot who drove a
plane off runway and quit. PROACTIVE commit crime by design.
So looking for an athlete to "throw game", want the rare overlap of
criminal and athlete.
Q&A: What about clustering on national lines?
Saunders has data and he and Mike are working on that.
Have divided world into about 100 components and looking at 56 of them.
How specifically is data broken down within country?
